principally

By services, 28 December, 2019

One of the exceptions from the rule that a rental property cannot qualify as a “former business property” for purposes of the replacement property rules in ITA ss. 13(4) and 44 references the situation of a “property … leased by the taxpayer to a person related to the taxpayer and used by that related person principally for any other purpose.” The property in question had been rented by the taxpayer to third parties and to a related person (“CR”) for use in CR’s business of reselling used buses.

In year 1 Father purchased Opco, in year 5 he transferred his shares equally to Child 1 who actively explanted the farming business of Opco along with Father (including after his death in Year 15), and to Child 2 who did not so participate. In Year 18 Child 2 transferred his or her shares to a holding company (Holdco), and in Year 20, wishes to transfer the shares of Holdco to a son. At all relevant times the assets of Opco were used in its farming business.