advance

An employer was required to withhold pursuant to s. 153(1) on fixed automobile allowance paid monthly even though, at the end of the year, it included in the T4 for the affected employee, the amount by which this total allowance exceeded the amount that the employee should have received based on the kilometres driven for business purposes. The sums paid could not constitute advances, as the employees were not obligated to repay the excess over the business kilometerage to the employer.

Customers of the corporation paid for services in advance, which the corporation showed as a liability on its balance sheet but deducted as a reserve in computing its income pursuant to s. 20(6). After finding that such amounts were not a reserve described in s. 181.2(3)(c), and in finding that they were includible in taxable capital pursuant to s. 181.2(3)(b) as “advances,” the Directorate stated:

An employer is considering changing its payroll system to a payment-in-arrears system, so that employees will be paid for work that was done two weeks previously. The employer will pay existing employees a one-time transition payment (TP), at the date of conversion, instead of having a gap in pay. However, upon termination of employment, the employee generally would be required to make a payment to the employer (the employer may choose to take the money from a payment being made to the employee).

Where a taxable Canadian corporation makes a non-interest bearing loan to a controlled foreign affiliate (CFA 1) which, in turn, uses the proceeds to acquire the debt (the "Debt") of another CFA (CFA 2) from a non-arm's length Canadian corporation. CRA found that s. 17(8)(a)(ii) was not available as the Debt would not be considered to be a loan to the second CFA.

By services, 28 November, 2015

Bankers acceptances held by the taxpayer were not "advances" to the issuer because the issuer had no obligation to repay the same sum of money to the taxpayer or to provide any goods or services, and its only payment obligation to the taxpayer was a contingent obligation to pay the face amount if the accepting bank failed to do so. Furthermore, the bankers acceptances were not bonds, debentures, notes, mortgages or similar obligation because the bank alone was primarily liable to pay the holder. Sharlow JA stated:

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer financed its work on the manufacture of defence products under two contracts by receiving advances from the prime contractor or an affiliated company. Noël J.A. found that the advances did not qualify as reserves which were included in capital under s. 181.2(3)(b) because the taxpayer had claimed a reserve for s. 20(1)(m) purposes. Instead, the amounts were included under s. 181.2(3)(c) as advances. Noël J.A. stated (at p. 5325):