A notional cash pooling arrangement between (i) a non-resident parent and its various subsidiaries including Canco, and (ii) a non-resident bank, as a result of which Canco has an overdraft balance in its pool account, is caught by the back-to-back loan rules in ss. 18(6)(c)(i) and 212(3.1)(c)(i). Accordingly, it is not necessary to consider whether the right of the non-resident bank to offset overdraft balances of any pool participants against deposit balances of other pool participants without prior notice engages the specified right rules in ss. 18(6)(c)(ii) and 212(3.1)(c)(ii).
Topics and taglines
Tagline
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
366867
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
366868
Extra import data
{
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": ""
}
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": ""
}