The taxpayer was found to be carrying on business in Canada on the basis that through a Canadian mandatory it offered for sale, in Canada, Costa Rican plantation lots and solicited orders for services to be provided by it in connection with the sold lots, with each investor paying an overall amount in connection with the transactions which constituted an "indivisible whole" (p. 519). Although s. 115(1)(a)(ii) required a reasonable allocation of revenue and deductions, the Minister had assessed on the basis that all the revenues and expenses were applicable to Canada, and the appellant had provided no evidence of any kind whatsoever that would permit the allocation of a portion of the revenues and expenses to Costa Rica.
Topics and taglines
Tagline
sales in Canada were indivisible whole
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333504
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Maya Forestales S.A. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 514, 2005 TCC 66 <strong>[sales in Canada were indivisible whole]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Maya Forestales S.A. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 514, 2005 TCC 66 <strong>[sales in Canada were indivisible whole]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}