Middlebrook v. Canada, 2013 DTC 5001 [at at 5501], 2012 FCA 264

By services, 28 November, 2015
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
2013 DTC 5001
Pinpoint
at 5501
Citation name
2012 FCA 264
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
356979
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [
"url::decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/37609/index"
],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "b94826f3973f55920f2121e130bfabe9bb24dc2057a6fb15a1bba24e92bd8d81",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": {
"url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/37609/index.do",
"title": "",
"attributes": [],
"original_title": "",
"original_url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/37609/index.do"
}
}
Style of cause
Middlebrook v. Canada
Main text

Federal Court of Appeal

Cour d'appel fédérale


Date: 20121022

Docket: A-8-12

Citation: 2012 FCA 264

CORAM: SHARLOW J.A.

DAWSON J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

BETWEEN:

JOHN P.T. MIDDLEBROOK

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 22, 2012.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 22, 2012.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DAWSON J.A.



Federal Court of Appeal

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20121022

Docket: A-8-12

Citation: 2012 FCA 264

CORAM: SHARLOW J.A.

DAWSON J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

BETWEEN:

JOHN P.T. MIDDLEBROOK

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on October 22, 2012)

DAWSON J.A.

[1] This is an appeal from an order of the Tax Court of Canada, rendered orally in Court File No. 2009-3861 (IT)G, which dismissed for delay the appellant's appeal from assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the 2000, 2001 and 2002 taxation years.

[2] The order under appeal is a discretionary order.

[3] Without endorsing everything said by the Judge, we have not been persuaded that the Judge erred in law or exercised his discretion pursuant to any wrong principle. Nor have we been persuaded that the Judge failed to observe any principle of natural justice or procedural fairness. Further, we are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence of delay to support the Judge's order.

[4] It follows that the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

“Eleanor R. Dawson”

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET: A-8-12

APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MARGESON OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA DATED DECEMBER 8, 2012, FILE NO. 2009-3861 (IT)G.

STYLE OF CAUSE: JOHN P.T. MIDDLEBROOK v. HER MAJESTY

THE QUEEN

PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING: October 22, 2012

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF

THE COURT BY: (SHARLOW, DAWSON & TRUDEL JJ.A.)

DELIVERED FROM THE

BENCH BY: DAWSON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Michelle Theberge

FOR THE APPELLANT

Sharon Lee

Donna Dorosh

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Theberge Professional Corporation

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE APPELLANT

MYLES J. KIRVAN

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

Docket
A-8-12