VA Miller J found that the taxpayer, who spent an equal amount of time in Canada and the UK, was a Canadian resident based on her personal ties to her daughter who, due to a custody assessment, lived in Edmonton. VA Miller J stated that "her settled routine was that she worked in the UK and she returned to Canada where she resided with her daughter" (para. 23).
Topics and taglines
Topic
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335936
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Edwards v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1025 [at 124], 2012 TCC 430 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Edwards v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1025 [at 124], 2012 TCC 430 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}