In a case respecting whether a reassessment of the Minister properly gave effect to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada, a transcript of comments made by the Supreme Court Justices in the course of argument before them was inadmissible as "nothing said by a judge of any court during the course of argument should be taken as an expression of that judge's opinion on the matter before the court" (p. 6734).
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332607
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Trzop v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2002 DTC 6728, 2001 FCA 380",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Trzop v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2002 DTC 6728, 2001 FCA 380",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}