Payments to the taxpayer of a monthly accommodation allowance, a monthly cost of living allowance and a "monthly function" allowance while he was in Toronto constituted predetermined amounts that did not correspond to the actual amount of the expenses incurred by him and he could use the allowances as he chose. Accordingly, the allowances were required to be included in his income under s. 6(1)(b).
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338418
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Rio\"></a>Rio v. Attorney General of Canada</em></strong>, 2004 DTC 6079, 2003 FCA 396",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Rio\"></a>Rio v. Attorney General of Canada</em></strong>, 2004 DTC 6079, 2003 FCA 396",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}