Before going on to find that the appellant ("Caithkin") was not making exempt supplies of foster care services to Children's Aid Societies (see summary under s. 2 of Part IV of Sched. V), Graham J found that Caithkin was making a "re-supply" to the Societies of "care, supervision and place of residence services" that it in turn "acquire[d] from the foster parents" (para. 24).
Topics and taglines
Tagline
on-supply of foster-care services
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332100
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Caithkin\"></a><strong><em>Caithkin Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 TCC 80, aff'd 2015 FCA 118 <strong>[resupply of foster-care services]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Caithkin\"></a><strong><em>Caithkin Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 TCC 80, aff'd 2015 FCA 118 <strong>[resupply of foster-care services]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}