Timmins v. R., 99 DTC 5494, [1999] 2 CTC 133 (FCA) -- summary under Business

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer was employed by the New Brunswick Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to assist in establishing and administering several dairy farms in Malawi, in consideration for which the Department received fees that were intended to cover its cost, cover overhead and make a small profit. In finding that the Department satisfied the requirement that it be carrying on a business, Noel J.A. stated (at para. 12) that in applying the definition of business in s. 248(1):

"It seems clear that even if it could be said that the Department was not carrying on a business in the ordinary sense, it was at least engaged in an 'undertaking of any kind whatever', namely the provision of services under a contract for a fee."

In any event, the Department was engaged in the business in the ordinary sense. Although the expected profits were small "a profit is a profit whether big or small and irrespective of one's motivation for generating it" (para. 21).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
N.B. government had a servicing undertaking, i.e., a business
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337118
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Timmins\"></a>Timmins v. The Queen</em></strong>, 99 DTC 5494 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state