Delle Donne v. The Queen, 2015 TCC 150 -- summary under Investment Contract

By services, 28 November, 2015

In rejecting a submission that the taxpayer was not entitled to deduct a doubtful debt reserve for unpaid interest because no written demand to pay the interest was made by the taxpayer, Owen J stated (at para. 60):

Although the precise meaning of the word "debt" may be the subject of some debate, it certainly encompasses a contractual obligation to pay an ascertainable sum such as the Interest, regardless of whether or not a demand for payment had been made by the Appellant.

See summary under s. 20(1)(l).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
"debt" exists irrespective of demand
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333801
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Donne\"></a>Donne v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2015 TCC 150 <strong>[\"debt\" exists irrespective of demand]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state