The recipient of a demand under s. 231(3) can successfully attack such demand before prosecution for failure to comply on a number of grounds including the following:
- That a reasonable time for production has not been afforded ...
- That the Minister is engaged in a fishing expedition and not a serious enquiry as to some taxpayer's liability.
- That the documents demanded are not germane or relevant to the issues between the parties.
- That the documents are privileged.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336665
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>R. v. McKinlay Transport Ltd.</em></strong>, 87 DTC 5051, [1988] 1 CTC 421 (Ont HC), affirmed 88 DTC 6314, [1988] 1 CTC 426 (Ont CA), further affirmed 90 DTC 6243, [1990] 1 SCR 627",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>R. v. McKinlay Transport Ltd.</em></strong>, 87 DTC 5051, [1988] 1 CTC 421 (Ont HC), affirmed 88 DTC 6314, [1988] 1 CTC 426 (Ont CA), further affirmed 90 DTC 6243, [1990] 1 SCR 627",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}