Crischuk v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1184 [at at 3427], 2010 TCC 276 -- summary under Subsection 160(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

Sums which the taxpayer's husband transferred to their joint bank account in order to make payments on a mortgage was secured on the family home, which is owned by the taxpayer, and to make payments on vehicle leases registered to the taxpayer, constituted transfers of property to her for purposes of s. 160(1).

Submissions made that full consideration was given in the form of the taxpayer's legal entitlement to be supported by her husband, and the use by her husband of a room in the home as an office, were inconsistent with the Yates decision. Furthermore, although the taxpayer performed household chores, these "were more in the nature of a donation rather than as consideration for the property transferred" [para. 26].

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334728
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Crischuk v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2010 DTC 1184 [at 3427], 2010 TCC 276",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}