DouangChanh v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 243 [at at 1335], 2013 TCC 320 -- summary under Subsection 166.2(5)

By services, 28 November, 2015

While the taxpayer's file for 2007 was on hold, pending the determination of a question in common with other taxpayers, the taxpayer submitted a T1 Adjustment Request to allow carrying charges. The Minister allowed the Request and issued a further reassessment. The taxpayer neglected to file a new notice of objection, and he took more than a year and 90 days to file his application to extend the time to file a notice of objection.

Woods J dismissed the taxpayer's application to allow the extension application. There is no basis on which to extend the s. 166.2(5)(a) deadline (para. 18).

(The decision ultimately favoured the taxpayer, as Woods J also found that the latest reassessment was barred - see summary under s. 152(4.2).)

Topics and taglines
Tagline
no discretion to extend deadline
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334968
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>DouangChanh v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 243 [at 1335], 2013 TCC 320 <strong>[no discretion to extend deadline]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}