Major J. found that a real estate property held by the taxpayer and others in connection with an adventure or concern in the nature of trade qualified as "inventory" even though it did not represent stock-in-trade of a trading business. In particular, under the plain meaning of the definition, "an item of property need only be relevant to business income in a single year to qualify as inventory" (p. 5555), i.e., a subsequent year in which the property may be sold.
Topics and taglines
Tagline
property held in an adventure was inventory
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337272
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Friesen v. The Queen</em></strong>, 95 DTC 5551, [1995] 3 SCR 103",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Friesen v. The Queen</em></strong>, 95 DTC 5551, [1995] 3 SCR 103",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}