Bueti v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 1213 [at at 1374], 2015 TCC 265 -- summary under Paragraph 248(8)(a)

By services, 28 November, 2015

Owen J made a factual finding that a particular property (a house in the estate of the taxpayer's father) was purchased for cash consideration by her and her husband, as joint tenants, rather than being devised to her under her father's will. Accordingly, her and her husband's cost of the property was their cash purchase price rather than being deemed by s. 70(5)(b) to be its higher fair market value at the time of their purchase.

Before so concluding, he observed that, under the laws of Ontario, residuary beneficiaries do not acquire an interest in any specific property in the residue of the estate and it is instead the residuary property is vested in the executors. Neither counsel mentioned s. 248(8)(a). See summary under s. 70(5).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
residuary beneficiary did not acquire as a consequence of death
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337483
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}