The taxpayer purchased prints from a promoter at approximately $300 per print (which the promoter contemporaneously had purchased for approximately U.S.$10 to U.S.$50 per print) and immediately donated the prints to Florida State University for an appraised value of approximately $1,000 per print. After noting that the best evidence of the fair market value of the prints was the value in a contemporaneous arm's-length purchase transaction, i.e., the purchase at $300 per print, rather than what it might be possible with "world enough and time" to sell the occasional print for in a New York gallery, Bowman A.C.J. found that the fair market value of the prints was $300 each.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333555
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Klotz v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2004 DTC 2236, 2004 TCC 147, affirmed 2005 DTC 5279, 2005 FCA 158",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Klotz v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2004 DTC 2236, 2004 TCC 147, affirmed 2005 DTC 5279, 2005 FCA 158",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}