In finding that the difference between the purchase price of notes and of commercial paper acquired by the taxpayer in the secondary market and their redemption price was interest to the taxpayer, Bédard, J. rejected the taxpayer's submission (at para. 6) that s. 12(9) of the Act and Regulation 7000(2) applied only to taxpayers who held prescribed debt obligations that were acquired at the time of their issue.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339956
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Goulet v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 1875, 2009 TCC 127 (Informal Procedure), aff'd 2011 DTC 5138 [at 6120], 2011 FCA 164",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Goulet v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 1875, 2009 TCC 127 (Informal Procedure), aff'd 2011 DTC 5138 [at 6120], 2011 FCA 164",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}