Mailloux v. Canada, 2013 DTC 5162 [at at 6401], 2012 FCA 331 -- summary under Res Judicata

By services, 28 November, 2015

In finding that the Tax Court had not erred in dismissing an appeal against a consent judgment entered into freely by the taxpayer after receiving tax advice, Blais CJ stated (at para. 8):

This Court has consistently held that when a person consents to an agreement that is later confirmed by a judgment, there is res judicata, and, barring exceptional circumstances, there can be no new intervention.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
consent judgment
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333077
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Mailloux v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 5162 [at 6401], 2012 FCA 331 <strong>[consent judgment]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}