Radage v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1615, [1996] 3 CTC 2510 (TCC) (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subsection 118.4(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

Before concluding that the severe intellectual limitations of the taxpayer's son rendered him incapable of performing such mental tasks as would enable him to function independently and with reasonable competence in everyday life, Bowman TCJ. found that the "and" in s. 118.4(1)(c)(ii) should be treated in context as disjunctive rather than conjunctive, and engaged in an extensive discussion of the meaning of the terms "thinking", "perceiving" and "remembering".

Topics and taglines
Tagline
"and" was used disjunctively
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333621
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Radage\"></a>Radage v. The Queen</em></strong>, 96 DTC 1615 (TCC) (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state