Canada v. JES Investments Ltd., 2007 DTC 5608, 2007 FCA 337 -- summary under Subsection 6202.1(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

An exploration company ("Deena") that entered into an agreement styled as a flow-through share agreement with the taxpayer failed to incur any Canadian exploration and development expenses so that its purported renunciation of such expenses was invalid, and went into receivership. The shares issued were found to be prescribed shares in light of a provision in the agreement providing:

"The Corporation hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Subscriber from and against any liability loss, damage or expense which the Subscriber may sustain or incur arising out of or in any way connected with the expenditure of the Subscription Amount."

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339948
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Jes Investments Ltd.</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 5608, 2007 FCA 337",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}