The taxpayer's common-law partner, who owed tax, transferred to the taxpayer his 50% interest in the house they shared, but reserved a right to use the house. Archambault J. found (at para. 31) that the reservation meant that taxpayer had not received an undivided interest in a property. Therefore, s. 160(3.1) was not applicable for calculating the fair market value of the transferred interest.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334746
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Gagnon v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1030 [at 128], 2010 TCC 482",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Gagnon v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1030 [at 128], 2010 TCC 482",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}