In finding that a notice of reassessment that the Minister mailed to the wrong address within the six-month period referred to in s. 152(4.1) should not be treated as being made within that period, Bell J found that a notice of assessment mailed to the wrong address could not be considered to have been mailed for the purposes of s. 244(14). With respect to a subsequent notice of reassessment that allegedly was mailed within the six-month period, Bell J. noted that although the Minister produced evidence of mailing procedures, no evidence of the date of mailing of the notice of reassessment was produced, with the result that the Minister had failed to meet the onus of persuading the Court that the taxpayer had been validly reassessed.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334601
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>236130 British Columbia Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 2053, 2005 TCC 770",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>236130 British Columbia Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 2053, 2005 TCC 770",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}