Maréchal v. Canada, 2006 DTC 6524, 2005 FCA 124

By services, 28 November, 2015
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
2006 DTC 6524
Citation name
2005 FCA 124
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
355549
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [
"url::decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/32648/index"
],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "aa2fa91ce0eaae29525d7f2f5611b0eb3cc411d5af523056b579980cef9c8970",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": {
"url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/32648/index.do",
"title": "",
"attributes": [],
"original_title": "",
"original_url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/32648/index.do"
}
}
Style of cause
Maréchal v. Canada
Main text

Date: 20050411

Docket: A-472-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 124

CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADONJ.A.

BETWEEN:

PAUL MARÉCHAL

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on April 5, 2005.

Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on April l1, 2005.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NOËL J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NADON J.A.


Date: 20050411

Docket: A-472-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 124

CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

MR. PAUL MARÉCHAL

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

NOËL J.A.

[1] The crux of the dispute before the Tax Court of Canada and before this Court is the fair market value of a sculpture donated by the appellant to the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts. The appellant challenges the amount of the appraisal accepted by Associate Chief Justice Bowman (as he then was).


[2] It would have been preferable to have the experts proposed by the appellant testify and explain in greater detail their appraisal of the work in question. They could have answered the trial judge's concerns, which might have resulted in a different outcome.

[3] In the absence of such testimony, however, we are of the opinion that the Associate Chief Justice did not commit an error warranting our intervention when he agreed with the analysis presented by Ms. Millar, according to which the best indicator of fair market value for the work donated by Mr. Maréchal was the price that he paid, increased by a multiple of approximately three, to take into account the fact that it was obtained at public auction.

[4] We are of the opinion, as the trial judge found in the hearing before him, that no costs should be awarded. The appeal will therefore be dismissed without costs.

"Marc Noël"

J.A.

"I concur.

Gilles Létourneau, J.A."

"I concur.

M. Nadon, J.A."

Certified true translation

Michael Palles


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET: A-472-04

STYLE OF CAUSE: Paul Maréchal v. Her Majesty

the Queen

PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING: April 5, 2005

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Noël J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY: Létourneau J.A.

Nadon J.A.

DATED: April 11, 2005

APPEARANCES:

Paul Maréchal

FOR HIMSELF

Nathalie Goyette

Chantal Jacquier

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Paul Maréchal

Montréal, Quebec

FOR HIMSELF

John H. Sims, QC

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT


Docket
A-472-04