MacLeod v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1010 [at at 60], 2012 TCC 379 -- summary under Subsection 160(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer held the matrimonial home. Her husband accumulated a tax debt for several years while he deposited amounts into the taxpayer's bank account which she used to pay the mortgage. V.A. Miller J. dismissed the taxpayer's contention that no transfer of funds had taken place. She could not be a "mere conduit" for her husband's mortgage payments because she was the only mortgagor named on the mortgage, and he was only a guarantor whose guarantee had not been called by the bank. Moreover, a deposit of funds into an account constitutes a transfer (Livingston).

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334739
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>MacLeod v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1010 [at 60], 2012 TCC 379",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}