Donato v. The Queen, 2009 DTC 1384 [at at 2111], 2009 TCC 590 -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i)

By services, 28 November, 2015

After finding that donations of cartoon drawings by the taxpayer did not qualify as dispositions of personal-use property, Woods, J. went on to find that there had been no negligence in reporting those drawings as having been donated as personal-use property by the taxpayer's wife given that at that time they could not have foreseen that the taxpayer would have successfully obtained a rectification order to have those drawings treated as never having been transferred by the taxpayer to his wife, and as instead having been donated by him directly to universities.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
reasonable not to foresee rectification order
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334539
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Donato v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 1384 [at 2111], 2009 TCC 590 <strong>[reasonable not to foresee rectification order]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}