Lamarre J found that the taxpayer was unable to demonstrate that permanent blindness in one eye markedly restricted any basic activities of daily living. On the contrary, the taxpayer had 20/20 vision in his left eye, a normal field of vision, an unrestricted driver's licence, and could read without difficulty.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333625
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Islam v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1143 [at 762], 2013 TCC 175 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Islam v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1143 [at 762], 2013 TCC 175 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}