The Court found that a "gain" for purposes of Article XIII, paragraph 9 of the Canada-U.S. Convention was a gain determined for purposes of s. 40(1) of the Act, i.e., a gain determined with reference to the period after December 31, 1971, rather than with reference to the total period of ownership (in this case, since 1967). MacGuigan J.A. noted (at p. 5456) that "the Convention does not require that there be a definition in the domestic legislation but only that the meaning of the term in question can be derived from it".
Topics and taglines
Tagline
no requirement for a definition per se in the domestic legislation for 3(2) to apply
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340624
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Attorney General of Canada v. Kubicek Estate</em></strong>, 97 DTC 5454, Docket: A-671-96 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Attorney General of Canada v. Kubicek Estate</em></strong>, 97 DTC 5454, Docket: A-671-96 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}