McDonald J.A. found that the capitalization of the taxpayer by non-resident related shareholders with close to 100% debt financing meant that the loans were those that no arm's-length lender would have made. Accordingly, it was not necessary to consider the taxpayer's argument that because the loans were those that arm's length persons would have made, Article 9 of the Canada-U.S. Convention effectively overrode the rule in s. 18(4) of the Act.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340678
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Specialty Manufacturing Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 99 DTC 5222, Docket: A-659-97 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Specialty Manufacturing Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 99 DTC 5222, Docket: A-659-97 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}