2529-1915 Québec Inc. v. Canada, 2009 DTC 5023 [at at 5585], 2008 FCA 398 -- summary under Shares

By services, 28 November, 2015

Overview of facts. The two individual taxpayers devised a scheme to: generate artificial capital gains of $110 million in some home-grown companies; pay the supposedly resulting capital dividend accounts (CDAs) of $55 million to another company (1915); generate artificial capital losses in the home-grown companies to offset their capital gains; effectively sell negotiated portions of the CDA to 3rd-party purchasers by having them subscribe for preferred shares at a 21% premium to their redemption amount with the shares' redemption amounts effectively being flowed out to the 3rd parties as purported capital dividends; and then pocketing such subscription "premiums" as capital dividends paid out to them. A more detailed summary of the facts is under s. 83(2).

Gains generated on income account. Noël JA found that the "gainmaking" shares which were acquired for the purpose of their immediate resale so as to give rise to such gains were acquired on income account, given that "property acquired for resale is held on account of revenue" (para. 73).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
shares acquired for immediate resale as part of capital dividend account generation scheme were on income account
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339326
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Faraggi\"></a>2529-1915 Québec Inc. and Faraggi v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 5012, 2009 FCA 398 <strong>[shares acquired for immediate resale as part of capital dividend account generation scheme were on income account]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}