After noting the submission for the accused that the relevant valuation test for sale of equipment by Canadian taxpayers to a related off-shore entity was the "reasonable amount" test in s. 69(3) rather than the "fair market value" test in s. 69(1), Schwartz J. found (at p. 6284) that he was not satisfied that the values used by the accused in their dealings with the off-shore corporation were unreasonable in all the circumstances.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338656
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>R. v. Kleysen</em></strong>, 96 DTC 6265 (Man QB)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>R. v. Kleysen</em></strong>, 96 DTC 6265 (Man QB)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}