Canada v. Castro, 2015 DTC 5113 [at at 6266], 2015 FCA 225, rev'g sub nom. David v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1111 [at 3236], 2014 TCC 117 -- summary under Subsection 118.1(2)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayers received charitable receipts for 10 times the amount of contributions, paid in cash, made by them to a registered charity. Woods J had allowed charitable credits for the amount of the cash donations made (see summary sub nom David).

After finding that the inflated receipt was not - in itself - a benefit that would vitiate a gift (see summary under s. 118.1(1) - total charitable gifts), Scott JA allowed the Minister's appeal on the basis that the receipts did not comply with Reg. 3501(1)(h) as they did not show the amount of the cash gifts and that Reg. 3501(6)(b) applied, which deems a receipt to be spoiled if it incorrectly records the amount of the cash gifts.

Jurisprudence (e.g. Mitchell) that "allowed for some flexibility on the basis that all the information was, in any event, readily available to the Minister" (para. 76) was not applicable, as such information was not so available here and Reg. 3501(6) unambiguously and specifically requires that a receipt accurately record the cash donation (paras. 78-80).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
inflated charitable receipt was invalid
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333569
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Castro_2\"></a>Castro v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2015 FCA 225, rev'g <em>sub nom. <a href=\"#David\">David v. The Queen</em></a>, 2014 DTC 1111 [at 3236], 2014 TCC 117<strong> [inflated charitable receipt was invalid]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}