Newmont Canada Corporation v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1117 [at at 628], 2011 TCC 148, aff'd 2012 DTC 5138 [at 7292], 2012 FCA 214 supra -- summary under Payment & Receipt

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer acquired a 100% undivided interest in a property (the "Quarter Claim") adjoining its "Golden Giant" mine subject to a 50% net profits royalty in favour of the vendor ("Teck/Corona"). In finding that the payment by the taxpayer of 50% of the net profits from the mining operations it conducted on the Quarter Claim did not entail a "reimbursement" by Teck/Corona for 50% of the mining taxes that the taxpayer paid as an expense of that operation, D'Arcy J. stated (at para. 77):

The allocation of revenue from the Golden Giant Mine to the calculation of the Quarter Claim Royalty was not payment of an amount by Teck/Corona. [The taxpayer] as the owner of the Golden Giant Mine (including the Quarter Claim) realized all revenue from mining the Golden Giant Mine. This revenue was not the revenue of Teck/Corona. Teck/Corona was only entitled to receive an amount as a royalty. Further, such royalty was only payable if the Royalty Account showed a credit balance.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
no implied set-off
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333011
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Newmont\"></a><strong><em>Newmont Canada Corporation v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1117 [at 628], 2011 TCC 148 <strong>[no implied set-off]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}