Renaud v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1094 [at at 2994], 2010 2010 TCC 76 -- summary under Subsection 62(3)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer made an eligible relocation to a residence in another town. Rather than sell his old residence, he rented it, which effected a deemed disposition under s. 45(1)(a). However, Campbell J. found at para. 9 that, while "sold" means "disposed of by sale," the effect of 45(1)(a) was a disposition other than by sale. Therefore, the taxpayer was not eligible to include the s. 62(3)(f) amount in his claimed "moving expenses."

Topics and taglines
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338526
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Renaud\"></a>Renaud v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2010 DTC 1094 [at 2994], 2010 2010 TCC 76 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}