After noting that the penalty in s. 163(1) was one of strict liability, so that it could be vacated if the taxpayer established due diligence, Woods J. went on to find that the taxpayer had not established due diligence in this case as she had not carefully reviewed the income tax return before she submitted it.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334783
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Saunders\"></a><strong><em>Saunders v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 2267, 2006 TCC 51 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Saunders\"></a><strong><em>Saunders v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 2267, 2006 TCC 51 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}