The appellant appealed a CRA decision to revoke its registration, which was made on grounds which included reference to substantial amounts paid for what appeared to be personal expenditures of an officer and director.
Ryer JA found (at para. 59) that s. 189(7) provided "a complete answer" to the appellant's submission that the availability to the Minister of the imposition of penalties on the appellant under s. 188.1(4) meant that the Minister was precluded from revoking the appellant's registration.
See summaries under s. 168(1)(e) and s. 172(3)(a.1).