A contract under which the taxpayer made a total contribution of $25,500 in consideration for a company agreeing to pay to the taxpayer 5.5% of the gross revenue from the operation of a lottery terminal in St. Petersburg, Russia for 10 years (with such company operating the terminal) only gave the taxpayer a right to earn income from property, and did not represent a concession or licence. Furthermore, as the agreement would not give rise to business income, the expenditure did not qualify as an eligible capital expenditure.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339797
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Rocheleau v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2010 DTC 1016 [at 2615], 2009 TCC 484 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Rocheleau v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2010 DTC 1016 [at 2615], 2009 TCC 484 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}