The taxpayer, a developer of market analysis software, paid fees to purchase or license historical securities data in order to simulate market conditions in testing. Boyle J agreed with the Minister that this agreement could not be considered a licence of "equipment" for the purpose of the taxpayer's claims for SR&ED credits. The taxpayer merely had the right to access information via a website rather than "any rights in equipment of the vendor that can be used by the Appellant as it wishes, as was the case [with a US mainframe and a dedicated line to access it] in Datakinetics." (Para. 10.)
Topics and taglines
Tagline
data licence was not equipment lease
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337863
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Inflection\"></a>Inflection Analytics Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2015 TCC 129 <strong>[data licence was not equipment lease]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Inflection\"></a>Inflection Analytics Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2015 TCC 129 <strong>[data licence was not equipment lease]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}