Imperial Oil Ltd. v. Canada; Inco Ltd. v. Canada, 2006 DTC 6639, 2006 SCC 46, [2006] 2 SCR 447 -- summary under Foreign Exchange

By services, 28 November, 2015

Before finding that the taxpayers were not entitled to recognize deductions under s. 20(1)(f)(ii) at the time they repaid U.S.-dollar denominated debentures following an appreciation in the U.S. dollar, LeBel discussed Tip Top, Eli Lilly, Alberta Gas and Imperial Tobacco, and stated (at para. 45):

[T]he above cases stand for the proposition that foreign exchange gains and losses incurred in relation to foreign trade cannot be separated from the underlying transaction such that the foreign exchange gain or loss would be on capital account while the underlying transaction would be on income account. … The above cases are not of assistance in the cases at bar, where it is common ground that but for an express statutory provision, the foreign exchange loss would be on capital account because the borrowing was on capital account.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
capital loss on capital borrowing
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339087
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Imperial Oil Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 6639, 2006 SCC 46",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}