In a case where the issue was whether the taxpayer was controlled by the husband of the individual who was its sole director, officer and shareholder, adverse inferences were drawn from the failure to call her husband as a witness, particular given the generally vague, imprecise and ambiguous nature of the testimony of the individual.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332659
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Corpor-Air Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 841, 2006 TCC 75",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Corpor-Air Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 841, 2006 TCC 75",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}