The taxpayer argued that the 50% limitation on meal expense deductions in s. 67.1 was discriminatory because it did not produce a roughly equivalent economic benefit to that enjoyed by government employees with respect to similar expenses. Hogan J. dismissed the argument. Section 67.1 has repeatedly held up under Charter scrutiny.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338577
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Stogrin v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2012 DTC 1021 [at 2599], 2011 TCC 532 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Stogrin v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2012 DTC 1021 [at 2599], 2011 TCC 532 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}