Little J. granted the taxpayer's s. 166.1 application. The taxpayer had filed a notice of objection within the ordinary objection period, and did not file her objection within that period only because she had been misled by a CRA Chief of Appeals to believe that she was supposed to wait to be contacted by a CRA officer before proceeding. Moreover CRA had mailed the Taxpayer's notices of reassessment to her former address. In the circumstances, denying the taxpayer's extension would be unconscionable.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334957
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Lambo v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1236 [at 1364], 2011 TCC 293",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Lambo v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1236 [at 1364], 2011 TCC 293",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}