Canada v. Lao, 97 DTC 5498 (FCA)

By services, 28 November, 2015
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
97 DTC 5498
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
354529
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "FCA",
"field_external_guid": [
"url::decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/35143/index"
],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "aace60d448cb20a94e7e983dacaddccc61544f4219e31acce96578957abf6f17",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": {
"url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/35143/index.do",
"title": "",
"attributes": [],
"original_title": "",
"original_url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/35143/index.do"
}
}
Style of cause
Canada v. Lao
Main text

A-361-93

CORAM:STRAYER, J.A.

LINDEN, J.A.

McDONALD, J.A.

B E T W E E N:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

-and-

VINCENT LAO

Respondent

HEARD at Toronto, Ontario, Thursday, October 23, 1997.

JUDGMENT delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on Thursday, October 23, 1997.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LINDEN, J.A.


A-361-93

CORAM:STRAYER, J.A.

LINDEN, J.A.

McDONALD, J.A.

B E T W E E N:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

-and-

VINCENT LAO

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

LINDEN, J.A.:

While Mr. Griffin has made some cogent arguments about the inconsistencies and injustices of the law in this area, we are of the view that, unless and until Parliament or the Supreme Court of Canada revises the law, we are bound to decide these cases in accordance with the principles enunciated by this Court in Phillips. In our view, the taxpayer in this case is "better off" because his "net worth has been increased" by the payment of the so-called housing allowance of $22,500. He has, to use the words used in Hoefele, been "enriched" not "restored". Hence, the amount is taxable under Section 6(1)(a).

In the light of this conclusion, there is no need to deal with the arguments raised under sections 6(1)(b) and 6(3).

The appeal will be allowed, the judgment of the Trial Judge will be reversed and the reassessment of the Minister will be restored. All reasonable and proper costs will be to the respondent.

"A.M. Linden"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO: A-361-93

STYLE OF CAUSE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

- and -

VINCENT LAO

DATE OF HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1997

PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LINDEN, J.A.

Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

on Thursday, October 23, 1997

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Donald G. Gibson

Mr. Henry A. Gluch

For the Appellant

Mr. Warren D. Griffin

For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Department of Justice

222 Queen Street

Ottawa, Ontario

K1A 0H8

George Thomson

Deputy Attorney General

of Canada

For the Appellant

Giesbrecht, Griffin & Funk

60 College Street

Kitchener, Ontario

N2H 5A1

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Court No.: A-361-93

Between:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

- and -

VINCENT LAO

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Docket
A-361-93