The taxpayer, which was a farm equipment dealer, was found to have received equipment from the distributor (Deere Canada) on consignment, rather than having acquired the equipment, notwithstanding that it had no express right of return over the equipment (this factor not being determinative in determining whether or not a consignment arrangement existed). There was no ambiguity in the terms of the agreements that the equipment was held on consignment.Accordingly, it did not qualify as the taxpayer's inventory.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337274
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Pardee Equipment Ltd.</em></strong>, 99 DTC 5012, <a href=\"http://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/en/1998/a-423-97_5941/a-423-97.html\">docket A-423-97</a> (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Pardee Equipment Ltd.</em></strong>, 99 DTC 5012, <a href=\"http://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/en/1998/a-423-97_5941/a-423-97.html\">docket A-423-97</a> (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}