Turbide v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1347 [at at 1941], 2011 TCC 371 -- summary under Subsection 31(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The Minister was incorrect in finding that the taxpayer's race-horse business was not a chief source of income for the purposes of s. 31. The taxpayer's only other major income source was a corporation in which he held 98% of all shares ("Fondatechnique"). Jorré J. stated (at para. 44):

The appellant's cash investment in the race-horse business was much greater than his investment in Fondatechnique. Although the sales figures for the horse business was between a quarter and a third of that of Fondatechnique, it is still an average of more than $230,000 per year. Over the three years in question, the appellant regularly spent time on the farming business throughout the year and this time, an average of around 30 hours a week, is significant.

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337840
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Turbide v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1347 [at 1941], 2011 TCC 371",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}