It was unnecessary to evaluate the appellant's due diligence arguments, but Paris J found that they would not have succeeded. The essence of the appellant's argument was that he had met his diligence obligations by appointing another director to manage the corporation's financial difficulties. Paris J found that the appellant should have at least taken some steps to monitor the new director's management and ensure that he was meeting tax obligations.
Topics and taglines
Tagline
failure to monitor other director
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332302
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Mignardi v. R.</em></strong>, [2013] GSTC 39, 2013 TCC 67 <strong>[failure to monitor other director]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Mignardi v. R.</em></strong>, [2013] GSTC 39, 2013 TCC 67 <strong>[failure to monitor other director]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}