The existence of an "anti-flip agreement" allegedly given by the taxpayer in connection with its purchase of shares (under which it would pay to the vendor any consideration received by it, on a subsequent sale by it of the shares, over and above the purchase price) was found not to be supported by the evidence.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333023
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Calce Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 959, 2005 TCC 335",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Calce Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 959, 2005 TCC 335",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}