NRT Technology Corp v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 DTC 5056 [at at 5816], 2013 FC 200 -- summary under Subsection 220(3.1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer failed to withhold income tax on a bonus it paid to its president, but caught the error 11 days later without any CRA involvement. The Minister's decision not to waive penalties was based chiefly on "the company's failure to quickly remedy the error." Mandamin J stated (at para. 40):

It is not clear which "error" the Director was referring to in his decision, nor how the Applicant failed to remedy the error, regardless of whether the error was the failure to remit or to address payment of the final penalty amount. The evidence supports the Applicant's claim that it quickly remedied its failure to remit the amount due and that it took steps to address the penalty owed as a result of the assessment.

The Minister's decision therefore was not justified, transparent and intelligible, and was sent back for redetermination.

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336350
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>NRT Technology Corp v. Canada (Attorney General)</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 5056 [at 5816], 2013 FC 200",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}