Kiperchuk v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1088 [at at 486], 2013 TCC 60 -- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(b)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer was the designated beneficiary of her husband's RRSP, and received the RRSP proceeds upon his death, and was assessed for his unpaid taxes under s. 160. Lamarre J found that the taxpayer and her husband were not related under s. 251(1)(b), because the RRSP devolved to the taxpayer directly by operation of Ontario's Succession Law Reform Act, rather than forming part of the husband's estate.

As the transfer to the taxpayer also was not a non-arm's length one under s. 251(1)(a) or (c), s. 160(1) did not apply.

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337500
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Kiperchuk v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1088 [at 486], 2013 TCC 60",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}