"[T]he only seizure that is authorized is of documents that may afford evidence of a violation." Consequently, "the authorization [of the judge] does not permit documents to be taken that have not been examined or searched for their evidentiary value in proving a violation". Because this standard was not met by the "wholesale seizure" of the taxpayer's documents, and because there had been material non-disclosure in the affidavits in support of the application, all the seized documents were ordered to be returned.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336703
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Kelly Douglas and Co. Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 82 DTC 6036, [1981] CTC 457 (BCSC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Kelly Douglas and Co. Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 82 DTC 6036, [1981] CTC 457 (BCSC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}